Pixels Per Meter
For comparing cameras and setting desired performance levels, we’ve found the simplest method is to use is pixels per meter (PPM), which is a measurement that defines the amount of pixels of definition across a 1m width at a specified distance from the camera. It’s a simple measurement that provides a fair comparison of the long-range magnification capabilities of each camera and avoids the essentially useless X-factor numbers that are misleading to customers (see sidebar). It is also an objective measurement of detail that can be agreed on by multiple parties.
Pixels per meter is calculated using two measurements:
Field of View
The field of view (FOV, also called angle of view) is the width of the scene that a camera detects on its sensor. It is determined by the focal length of the lens in relation to the sensor size. Longer lenses or smaller sensors produce narrower fields of view, while shorter lenses or larger sensors produce wider fields of view.
A smaller field of view means that a camera is more “zoomed in” (to use a term that most people are familiar with). For example, a camera with a 90° horizontal field of view (HFOV) will see a 1000m wide section of a wall that is 500m in front of it. If you then adjust that camera’s HFOV to only 1°, it will fill the screen with an 8.7m wide portion of that same wall. This second “zoomed in” field of view is what customers are looking for when they want a camera that can see a long distance. They want a narrow field of view.
Sensor Resolution
The other contributor to long-range camera performance is the sensor resolution. This determines the level of detail within a camera’s field of view. For example, using the 1° HFOV result from above, a newer HD sensor and an old analog CCTV sensor will both produce images that fill the screen with 8.7m of the wall. The analog sensor has a horizontal resolution of 640 pixels, which means it displays 640 segments of detail across that 8.7m scene. This works out to 73.5 pixels per meter (640 ÷ 8.7). The HD sensor on the other hand, with a horizontal resolution of 1920 pixels, provides 3 times that level of detail with a value of 221 pixels per meter.
The images below show the importance of taking resolution into consideration. Using the same hypothetical cameras from the previous example, a North American license plate would take up 3.5% of the screen width on both cameras (it would be the same field of view), however the older analog sensor would render that plate with only 242 pixels (22×11), while the HD sensor would render it with over 2,200 pixels (67×33). This distinction is the difference between a blur of pixels and a clearly readable plate.